SCVNews.com | City Must Pay $5 Million if Solar Panels are Demolished

Perry Smith

Signal management editor

With a “power vs. space … two major pillars of environmental sustainability,” OpenSpace won the city’s victory this week at a price of $ 5 million.

A judge in the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled that Canyon View Estate violated a conditional license requiring certain parts of mobile home park land to be open space.

As a result, the city has the right to demolish, remove, and restore open spaces in the Canyon View panel, the ruling said. “At the same time, if the city decides to exercise this right, the court imposes repayment conditions on the defendant regarding the granting of an injunction.”

According to the ruling, the court found that the refundable cost of removing the system was $ 5 million and “put the ball in the city proverb court.”

The court considered two issues: whether the city was in a position to request a conditional permit for the installation of solar panels in 2017, and the terms of the conditional permit granted by the Los Angeles County for solar panels. Was violated in 1984, before the city was born.

According to the ruling, “Conditional licenses are zoning regulations, so it is up to the local zoning authorities to enforce them,” the city said. Holds the position as. ” A park published by the county in 1984, before the city was founded. ”

In addition, the court said the city “acted within its authority when requesting permission and was not preempted.”

The court also said that even if the lawn was groomed in the mobile home park, the space was “neither natural nor open” and the panel’s ruling violated the park’s open space requirements.

The installation of solar panels covered approximately 2.689 acres on the hillside of Canyon Country, and the judge also determined that the area violated what the project claimed in the project’s initial permit application. did.

However, noting that the case is a complex case with factors specific to mobile home parks, the judge decided that “the all-or-nothing approach is neither fair nor impartial.” Both sides have some responsibility for the current plight. ”

Relation